Sunday, September 10, 2006


In the post 9/11 world it is hard to believe that anyone could even consider electing Hillary Clinton to office. The ABC documentary that they are protesting no doubt points out the fact that under the democrats we are vulnerable to the terrorists and I hope ABC stands by their documentary and doesn't let the liberal powers that be censor them. FOr a power that screams for freedom of speech, they sure change their tone when it might show them for what they really are. ABC show the documetary, let the people decide from all the facts. WHen the people have seen the danger of democrats in power the democrats can pack up and move somewhere more likely to buy their crap, maybe Canada or France.

Monday, May 01, 2006

A Day without illegal immigrants

I'm watching the news and getting more frustrated by the minute. What is with these immigrant protests? When did we stop differentiating between legal and illegal immigrants? What are legal immigrants doing taking the day off from school and work to support those who illegally came into our country? Why is anyone supporting someone who illegally came into our country AND are illegal immigrants really immigrants? Let's get this clear, America is a nation of immigrants and there is no threat to legal immigrants. There is no prejudice against immigrants. Therefore, there is no need for an immigrant to protest. The issue, illegal invaders, criminal aliens, not immigrants. So why are we having protests for immigrant rights. The people who's rights these people fear are being taken are not immigrants, they are invaders. Immigrants come legally, invaders make their first act on US soil a crime, their very presence. So, anyone who protests for the rights of these people missing work and school should lose their job and be suspended from school. They are supporting criminals, law breakers, alien invaders. So let's make this very clear. Immigrants are welcome in our country, therefore these protests are not for immigrant rights but for the rights of criminals and therefore these protests are not justified nor are they acceptable. When will our media start pointing out the difference between an immigrant and an illegal invader? When?

Thursday, April 20, 2006


Ok I have to apologize for my lack of posts BUT my time was tied up elsewhere calling, faxing and writing my senators and representatives TRYING to make them understand that they are out of touch with their constituents if they think because a bunch of illegals is louder, they should get their attention. Let me make something clear, illegals don't vote (or at least not LEGALLY) and if they become legal, they won't vote republican. These are welfare babies, opportunists, leeches, they'll vote democrat. So why is it that our republican leaders want to shoot themselves in the foot by legalizing millions of democrat, entitlement hungry Mexicans? Lets see if I can make this clear, your constituents (the ones who vote for you) want you to uphold the law and deport these criminals. We want a hard days work to pay fairly. The Mexicans that are flying our flag upside down under their Mexican rag? THEY have their loyalty elsewhere and should they get the right to vote, they'll vote your butts out and vote in the liberals!! I say if your senator votes for amnesty then YOU vote his ass out before the Mexicans can!! Why don't they understand that THEIR loyalty is to Americans and Americans only. They owe nothing to law breaking Mexicans and had BETTER wake up and realize that by selling out their fellow Americans, they sell out America and most likely themselves.

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Down to the wire

If Senator Brownback and Senator Kennedy have anything to say about it, you and I, the American worker, will no longer be a commondity. Senator Brownback and his fellow Senate Judiciary Committee members have just sent up a proposal for Amnesty. Call it what they want it is a reward for illegal behavior. A reward for costing the American tax payer billions. A reward for driving the wages of your average everyday Joe down into the nether regions. What most people don't understand is that the American worker is a commodity and if we are in demand and needed we are worth something (a living wage). If illegals (falsely pc referred to as undocumented workers) are brought in to fill jobs (that Americans WILL do for a fair wage) then we are no longer a marketable commodity. Case in point, nurses in Kansas make peanuts in comparisson to nurses in other states and the hospitals and nursing homes are screaming nursing shortage. Increase the nursing pay to a fair wage for someone who has the education of a nurse and you will no longer have a nursing shortage BUT Senator Brownback of Kansas would rather bring in foreign workers then let the market do it's job and increase the pay to a fair wage for a nurse. Senator Brownback adds this little piece of legislation to a bill that harms all of us and in fact contributes to the low pay for nurses that is causing a nursing shortage. The fact that we are paying for the medical care of millions of illegal scum sucking aliens puts our medical establishments in financial jeopardy and they are unable to pay nurses a fair wage. The bill that Senator Brownback attached his little bit of legislation to and proceeded to vote for actually rewards these criminals AND hurts the nurse further. If we allow the system to work, the supply and demand of workers to balance out, we will all win.
I am not against all foreign help, don't get me wrong. I do not agree with President Bush that most of the jobs taken by these illegals are jobs Americans won't do. I believe many of the jobs are jobs that Americans won't do without being compensated fairly.
When I contacted Senator Brownback's office I got the "what about agriculture jobs' business. Seasonal agriculture jobs are one of those jobs that you will have to import labor for because they are temporary and most workers in the US need full time year round jobs. There are programs for importing this help and these programs work. Instead of trying to replace these programs with illegal aliens they need to make the system easier to use and less cumbersome for the employer NOT allow less than honest employers to use illegal labor at the expense of the US tax payer.
My husband has used the H2A visa system for about 8 years and it is expensive and cumbersome but it is legal. Change this system. make it easier and less expensive DON'T reward lawbreakers. Mr Brownback you should be ashamed for selling out your constituents!! If it talks like a liberal and it votes like a liberal...................................

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Senator Brownback What are you thinking?

As a reluctant citizen of Kansas (I still consider myself a Washingtonian at heart) and a conservative Republican I am outraged with my Senator. Senator Brownback is a member of the judiciary committee. As we speak the judiciary committee is trying to reward criminals for ignoring our sovereignty. I don't know about all of you but I teach my children that you gain nothing by cheating or stealing but I will now have to tell them that if you are a Mexican, that doesn't count, at least not, here in the good old USA. You see there are two different kinds of just about every race. You can't pigeonhole people by their race because there is bad and good in all of them. With Mexicans there are the ones who come here legally, learn the language and really want to be Americans and then there are the law breaking scum who illegally cross our borders, lower our wages, milk our education funding, drain our medical system and sneer at our culture and THESE are the scum sucking vermin that Brownback and Kennedy want to reward. This reward will cost you and me dearly!!! Why is it that our constitution that swears that our government will protect us from invaders is last on our Senator's list? This is like those judges that legislate from the bench rather than supporting the constitution. Why is it that the welfare of a bunch of criminal non citizens is more important to our government then US citizens? These people bring diseases into our midst because they have no immunization for diseases that the US has not had to face in quite a while. They are a danger to every aspect of our lives. The fact is that there are legal ways of coming into our country and the kind of people who do that are welcome to do so (of course we must be selective) but the kind of people who ignore our laws and invade our country are not wanted by the American people (maybe by unscrupulous employers). People take a stand, call your senators, call mine, but somehow let them know that we do not want Amnesty for these leeches. We're tired of paying for the ones behind bars and having to let rapists loose due to overcrowding, they are President Fox's problem not ours. We're tired of paying for our children's education and our children not getting the full benefit because bunch of illegals are sucking the funding from our schools. We're tired of not being able to afford medical care while Mexicans get it for free driving up our costs. We're tired of making less because we are not a commodity when you can get an illegal (yes ILLEGAL not undocumented) to do it for slave wages and we are tired of feeling like aliens in our own country when we walk in the store and there are signs in Spanish and half of the people there can't or refuse to speak English! This is war and our senators want to aid and abet the invaders!! This is economic war, this is cultural war and this is a war for our sovereignty, for our borders!! People had better start paying attention!!

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Colorado History Teacher-syllabus of US hatred

Sean Allen is a brave child. In an ultra liberal suburb of Denver he had the courage to 'out' a teacher who is teaching 'marxist' rhetoric and hatered of the US. Allen is the son of a conservative father and a liberal mother and obviously knows when what he is hearing is wrong. Jay Bennish seems to be running some sort of brainwashingt camp for future liberal Jihad of America. His hatered for America is obvious in the taped excerpts from Sean Allen's MP3.

Who would an America hating teacher hire to defend him, why the ACLU and not just any lawyer from the ACLU but the same lawyer who defended Ward Churchill, David Lane. Al though Mr Bennish has every right to speak his mind, he does not have the right to teach this rhetoric to a captive audience of public school kids who's parents sent them to school to learn not to be brainwashed.

The Mike Church show tonight has Sean on his show and I was very impressed by this young man and the other caller, a 2001 grad, who stated that he too had been a victim of this man's rants. So I ask you, who's civil rights have been robbed? The teacher or the kids who were force fed his anti american poison?

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay or Gribbit. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 150 blogs already on-board

Saturday, February 18, 2006

Clinton anti-freedom of Speech


In the Daily Times I recently read an article about former president Clinton speaking in Islamabad about the recent upheaval over the Danish cartoons. President Clinton condemned the publication of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) caricatures by European newspapers and urged countries concerned to convict the publishers. (Daily Times article) Obviously, freedom of speech is not as important as he might have previously claimed. I wonder, how would he have reacted if the cartoon had been of Jesus rather than Muhammad. I think we all know. I say, support the Danish.
In this world the liberals will protect your right to burn our flag. They will support your right to blasphemy God, sometimes calling it art and financing it. They will support your right to proliferate pornography. BUT, make a joke involving the 'peaceful' Muslims and you've crossed the line. IT seems in this day and age people get offended very easily and think that their right to not be offended supersedes the right to free speech. Sure, it might have been insensitive but, in all fairness, many of the cartoons were only satirizing many sad truths. Personally, the one of Muhammad with the bomb on his head, I found all too telling. All these suicide bombers doing it in the name of Muhammad, I mean come on people it's not like there wasn't a thread of truth in the satire. There have been cartoons making fun of Christians and, as a Christian, I can see the humor in some of them. Just because someone doesn't agree with your beliefs does not make them void of the freedom of speech. So, it's time for these 'peace loving' Muslims to settle down and GET OVER IT. Seems people get offended pretty easy these days and cry foul rather than realizing that in a society where the freedom of speech is valued, you may need to learn to deal with the occasional offense and learn not to take it personally or you will spend your life being incensed and offended. Sometimes we have to take responsibility for our own reactions instead of infringing on the rights of others. I have never seen the right to live without being offended in the Constitution.
Speaking of cartoons:
Mind you, some might find it offensive (has some language) but it really makes a point.

Friday, February 17, 2006

Hillary and the Military

An Email I Had to Share With You All
Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has already started her 2008 presidential campaign by aligning herself with the military and pretending to be tough on terror. Fortunately, the ultra-liberal Hillary has yet to brainwash all of the voting public in to believing that her symbolism is really substance. Many have never forgotten that when she was co-president for eight years she was quoted as saying: " I loathe the military"

The picture shows that this soldier has been thru Survival School and learned his lessons well. He's giving the sign of "coercion" with his left hand. These hand signs are taught in survival school to be used by POW's as a method of posing messages back to our intelligence services who may view the photo or video. This guy was obviously being coerced into shaking hands with Hillary Clinton. It's ironic how little she knew that he would so inform us about the photo---perhaps because she's never understood our military to begin with.

Cry Babies in the Corps - The PRESS corps that is

How many of you are sick of the whining of the DC press corps? You would think they were a branch of government that was let out of the loop. They are merely reporters and need to get over themselves, much like actors these days.
So, here is the whole story: The vice-president goes on a private hunting trip with no press or other official entourage except his physician's assistant, secret service, etc. He has a beer at lunch hours before he is hunting and accidentally sprays bird shot in the direction of a friend who did not announce himself. He then immediately turns his attention to the health of his friend getting him medical help, ambulance, etc. The woman with him was once a wildlife bigwig and is a local as well as an eyewitness. She is well credentialed to get the information out accurately. She makes sure, with the blessing of Mr. Cheney, that the local press gets the story which eventually makes it to the mainstream press. These press corps types think they are 'entitled' to the story first. They are nothing but 'the press' and have shown themselves to be biased against the current administration at every turn and, given this information before it was accurately reported in Corpus Christi, they would have put twists on it to make the administration look bad, THAT IS WHAT THEY DO. Then when Mr. Cheney goes to Fox News (referred to by a member of the leftist press as the 'F word network') because he feels comfortable with their handling of information, they are up in arms again that he didn't go to a less friendly less reliable source like CBS, ABC or NBC. You see, these sources obviously never studied journalism or the idea of 'unbiased' journalism might once in a while creep into their news shows. Would Clinton have gone to Fox? Why, when the others are his go to guys for twisting the news the way he wants it? ABC, NBC and CBS are the best friends the DNC has, free advertising and innuendo. Hey press corps, Mr Cheney is not stupid. He wanted the true facts to get out (just the facts man) not a bunch of rhetoric and inference. He answered all the questions with eloquence and Mr Hume asked all the questions needing to be asked. By the way, how's that story on Kennedy's handling of his little accident coming along? It took him how long to report it? It took him how long to check on the welfare of his mistress/staff member? How would you handle that? How would FOX handle that? Hmmmmm, unbiased journalism, what a novel idea. Now isn't there more important things to report on? Maybe Iran? OF course that would depend on your aim. Is your goal to report the news or twist the news to take down the current administration?
Personally, I think every newscast by the 'big three' should have a disclaimer, 'brought to you in cooperation with the DNC' in the corner of the screen, now THAT is truth in journalism.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

It's ACLU Thursday!!!!

The Anti-American Communistic Lawyers Union has some very confusing points of view that can mean only one thing. We are too stupid for our freedom.
Did you know that by making late term abortion illegal we 'force' women to endanger their lives with back-alley abortions? The fact that we deem birthing a baby until it's head almost leaves the birth canal and jamming a pair of scissors into the base of it's brain and scrambling and sucking it's brains out, murder makes us insensitive to the plight of a woman who waited until their 8th or ninth month to kill her baby. The ACLU wants to argue that our keeping her from killing this baby at this point is a violation of HER civil rights? Their favorite argument is that we are keeping a woman who could die from saving her own life, so I guess letting the baby come all of the way out of the birth canal without killing it would kill the mother?
Likewise, protecting our borders "causes' illegal immigrants to die in the desert. I'd say the stupidity of law breaking invaders causes them to perish in the desert. According to the ACLU we are 'forcing' these people to risk their lives and die. There is this system that allows you to 'legally' enter the US and if done this way you most likely will not die in the desert.
The fact that the entry of these criminals into our country illegally harms the civil rights of Americans is not of any consequence to the ACLU. They are the most un-American of groups and yet carry the name American in their monaker and receive our money to support their attempt to destroy our way of life, to take away our civil rights while defending the civil rights of deviants, criminals and the morally retarded at every turn. They attempt to take away the civil rights of every decent America loving, Christian in the US in order to defend the supposed civil rights of deviants.
They find the sight of a manger scene at Christmas morally reprehensible and yet defend those who would sodomize our sons. They think every child should have the right to view pornography in the public library but not the right to pray before their meal at school. Civil rights is not their concern, their concern is the complete eradication of our Christian history and all manner of decency.
I urge my readers to appeal to the Attorney General of the United States to call a Special Counsel to investigate possible criminal wrongdoing and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those responsible within the ACLU for any damage to top secret programs that have been enacted in furtherance of National Security and the war on terror; any funding directly or indirectly aiding a terrorist organization; giving representation, aid and comfort to admitted terrorists; invading the privacy of their own members; hindering the ability of the government to protect the citizens of the Untied States of America; and any attempt to destroy evidence of any of these acts.
John Stephenson has compiled an extensive list of reasons why they should be investigated at this link.

Friday, February 10, 2006

Black History Month?

Ok, I'm gonna say it. The most racist people in the US are Democrats, namely Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. If we are all equal and all Americans then why do these two boobs spend all of their time pointing out the differences? Why do they spend all of their time reminding Americans with black skin that in the past they weren't equal. Can you imagine White History Month being accepted? Why do we need Black History Month? Shouldn't it be American History Month and include great people of history regardless of their color? Democrats and, unfortunately, democrats of color will not allow for true equality because they insist on constantly separating the races. If what they wanted was true equality there would no longer be black history month nor would there be African-Americans or Mexican Americans, we'd just be Americans and isn't that true equality?

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

In the words of Theodore Roosevelt

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag....We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Enough Said?

Sunday, January 29, 2006


WOW when did the democrats officially join ranks with Osama Bin Laden? I say officially since they've been anti-American for some time but to hear the comments of Bin Laden was laughable. The same rhetoric the democrats use to try to fool Americans is being used by Bin Laden, amazing! Do you think this has made the democrats step back and re-assess their stance, hardly. Hopefully, though, Americans are paying attention to the similarity between the left and the terrorist. Whether it is coming from the left or from a terrorist, it is still the same trash meant to destroy our country. When people such as Harry Belefonte and AlGore go over seas and trash the US I personally think that they should be exiled. Their comments are damaging to our country. It seems that over the years the pride that Americans had in their country has disappeared. There was a time that if you disagreed with the current administration you didn't go around tearing them and your country down especially not in other countries. You still had respect and pride in your country. I admit that when Clinton was president I was embarrassed but I still respected my country too much to take her down with him.
If the democrats had anything to offer they'd be making speeches about their ideas and how they want to change things but instead they run around like Jr High little girls tearing down others to try to make themselves look better knowing they have nothing any better to offer. I think they know that the American people in general don't want what they are offering so in a last ditch desperate attempt they are using school girl tactics to try to make the other guy look bad so they might be seen as the lesser of the two evils. Unfortunately, in the process, they are dragging down the US with them. They are giving ammunition to hour enemies. They are traitors and at the least should not be able to be part of our government. There was a time when senators, ex vice-presidents etc. were held to a higher standard of public behavior. I believe there was a time that they would no longer have a position in our government if they demeaned our country overseas in this way.
After Pearl Harbor, when we were forced to war, had our media and our government officials acted as they do now, we would be speaking German now if we were speaking at all. Personally, I think we should put these anti American Democrats in a room and pipe in nothing but "Have You Forgotten", "Courtesy of the Red White and Blue" and "American Soldier" until they wise up. We might also try bombarding them with the words of our forefathers and the constitution until they get the picture. We'll call it indoctrination into the American way.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

FOR OUR BOYS Posted by Picasa


I want you all to know that I understand the need for foreign workers. My husband and I have a custom harvesting company and we require seasonal workers willing to travel most of 7 months of the year. There are no medical benefits, not even for us. We've had trouble finding workers in the US willing to work a seasonal job with no benefits and when we did find them they would quit part of the way through the harvest. About 8 years ago we started using the H2A Visa system to aquire foreign workers from places such as New Zealand, Australia and even Denmark this last year. We found hard workers, many educated or at least trained, they were dependable and it was all done legally. The drawbacks to this program include the expense of the Visas, the requirement by immigration that we pay higher wages than we usually do (another reason why we still would rather hire americans) the need to house and feed all of our workers and just the hassle of the program. We are a small family owned company and we are forced to pay more for our foreign workers. Yet many big companies with much more money and power hire illegal immigrants for pennies on the dollar. It angers me that we are barely scraping by because we do things legally while the big guys get a bargain for them and a burden for the tax payer. The H2A visa program is limited to a small number while millions off 'undocumented workers' come over our borders to work for these less than honest employers. Many people would believe that there isn't much of a difference in the different foreign workers and their roll but I will point out to you that the differences are astonishing and costly.

When our H2A visa workers come to the US they must have appropriate immunizations. These 'undocumented workers' (Oh Come On they are invaders, criminals, leeches) come bringing TB and many other risks to our health due to their lack of immunizations. Our workers must purchase an insurance policy so as not to burden our healthcare system. Every year we pay for the heathcare, births etc. of millions of leeches nicely referred to as undocumented workers! WHen our workers are done with their job, we sign a form stating when they were released and they are booked on flights back to their individual homes and they GO THERE!!! Many Mexican workers with or without a green card fade into our society and live off of our welfare system, benefit from our healthcare system, fill our jails and get educations compliments of the citizens of the US.

Custom harvesters are actually dealt a double wammy when it comes to immigration though. Custom Harvesters from the United States are going out of business every year and at a highly alarming rate because the US allows Candian harvesters to come into the US and take our jobs. That's right, they can come in, offer lower prices since they don't pay our taxes and put Americans out of business and the government does nothing about it.

When we hire foreign workers we must first prove we cannot find an American to take the job yet Canadian harvesters can be hired even if there are American harvesters to do the job, even if it puts American harvesters out of business.

When harvesters go out of business who's going to pick up their tax burden for our Mexican Welfare System?


It seems that every time I go to Wal-Mart I leave with an utter distaste for our immigration system. When I am in Wal-Mart 50-75% of the people I see are hispanic and I have to wonder how many of those are illegally in our country. Illegal or not, if they come into our country, they need to assimilate. Why do merchants such as Wal-Mart insist on enabling these people to thumb their noses at our culture? WHY do they insist on enabling them to continue to speak exclusively spanish? I speaking, of course, of the self check out terminals that want to know if I want to check out in English or Spanish and the signs throughout the store in both languages and, of course, the employess who can't speak English. If they want to spend the money spend it on English lessons for the legals and one way trips for the illegals.

Recently I was listening to talk radio and a caller made an interesting statement, he stated that these hispanics (most of them Mexican) are 'colonizing' our country. WOW what a revelation. I don't think that merchants such as Wal-Mart understand the harm they are doing to our country in the name of the all mighty dollar. If these people insist on being here then they need to learn English to function, WE do not need to make it easy for them to stay ignorant of our language. There was a time that anyone who wanted to immigrate to the US and any that wanted to become citizens had to learn our history, our culture, and yes, our language. These days Americans pay so that immigrants can stay ignorant to our way of life. Who do you think pays for interpretors? For all of the forms printed in multiple languages? For school teachers who are multi-lingual? Do you not think that our children pay when their teachers have to spend half of their time teaching in another language? Teaching children whose parents, most likely, pay no taxes? Our children get short changed on their education because OUR tax dollars have to go to pay for education for illegal aliens. Let's call a spade a spade, their parents are criminals, invaders of our country! You and I probably paid for their birth in one of our hospitals, their immunizations, their healthcare. It is very likely we are paying for their food stamps. We pay in many ways. We pay through lower wages when companies can pay illegals less than a fair American wage. We pay because many of these are not only criminals because they crossed our borders illegally but many were criminals in their own country, we have become mexico's dumping ground for their criminals and their uneducated labor force. We pay to keep them in our jails!

I find it disturbing that if these people were arab we'd be demanding they be removed immediately and be scared but because they are latino we put up with their invasion. Don't kid yourselves we HAVE been invaded and though they do not fight a war with us in the traditional sense of guns and tanks, they are conducting a war!! They have declared economic war on us as well as cultural war and we are playing dead. I was recently in Dumas, Texas and I literally felt like an alien in my own country. Does no one realize that in these border states there are enough of these people to take over if they saw fit? Do enough people not know that their military has, on many occasions, crossed our borders to protect their smugglers? This IS a war and until the people of the US start treating it that way we are at risk of losing it!! Our military is protecting everyone's border but ours! We DO need to be protected from this invasion but, instead, our government is treating it as more of a nuisance than the war that it is. We are not Mexico's welfare state and, I for one, will not roll over and play dead while these leeches decimate MY country!!

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of Government and shall protect each of them against invasion

United States Constitution
Article IV, Section 4

So, where are the forces sworn to protect us?